Diary #03
Embedded Files
A BIT OF CONFUSION
A BIT OF CONFUSION
YOUTH
A referendum, many interpretations and the desire to understand before making a choice.
THE STORY
THE STORY
How do you make an informed decision when the information seems to say different things?
This is a question a young woman recounts asking herself during the campaign for the March 2026 referendum on justice. For her, it was an important issue, connected to the organisation of the justice system and the functioning of democratic institutions. Precisely for this reason, she wanted to understand its meaning before voting.
"I was, like I think all Italian citizens were, bombarded with posts, news, information, including false information, which caused me quite a bit of confusion" she recounts.
The content reached her through social media, television and search engines. Some appeared spontaneously in her feed; others were encountered while trying to learn more. The young woman recognised different objectives in the messages: to inform, explain, support a position, convince or mobilise.
Her critical assessment of the clarity of institutional information also made the process more difficult: she would have liked more accessible explanations of an issue she considered important.
The confusion, however, did not lead her to give up. She searched for other sources and discussed the subject with different people. She describes the exchange as useful even when those taking part held different views from her own.
The credibility she attributed to sources mattered: the more competent and reliable a person or piece of content seemed to her, the more willing she was to consider the information. When faced with opinions expressed by people she respected, further doubts could arise.
We do not know how she voted. The core of the testimony is not an electoral choice, but the attempt to understand a public issue without stopping at the first answer.
The young woman also observes how quickly her Instagram feed can change following the posts she interacts with. She would like greater transparency and responsibility from platforms and, at the same time, greater care from those who use them. Her advice is to take time, compare sources and keep discussing.
BEYOND THE STORY
— Getting informed is also participating
BEYOND THE STORY
— Getting informed is also participating
Democratic participation requires not only access to information, but also the ability to understand and evaluate it. During a referendum campaign, news, analyses, opinions and messages designed to persuade coexist: the intention to convince does not, in itself, imply falsehood or manipulation.
The testimony distinguishes individual research from the forms of mediation that help make certain content visible: platforms, editorial choices, people and relationships. It does not demonstrate that a feed determined the young woman's vote or opinion; it documents her attention to how information is selected.
Discussion with other people can raise new questions, without guaranteeing identical answers. The young woman proposes an approach that remains open to uncertainty and verification, rather than considering familiarity with a source as sufficient proof.
A QUESTION FOR YOU
A QUESTION FOR YOU
"When you look for information, are you always certain that it is everything you can know?"
Page updated
Report abuse